State v. Stirton
Annotate this CaseFILED: July 19, 2006
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON,
Respondent,
v.
ROBERT W. STIRTON,
Appellant.
A129412
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County.
Mary Ann Bearden, Judge.
Submitted on record and briefs June 8, 2006.
Roger Lee Clark filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Seann C. Colgan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Landau* and Ortega, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Reversed.
*Landau, J., vice Ceniceros, S. J.
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted in Central Lane County Justice Court on 12 violations. He appealed to the Lane County Circuit Court and moved for a waiver of the filing fee. ORS 21.605(1)(a). The court denied defendant's motion. Defendant appeals, contending that the trial court's denial was an abuse of discretion because no evidence in the record contests any material in his affidavit of indigence and the court provided no explanation why it denied the motion. The state concedes that the court's denial was an abuse of discretion. We agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.