Maney v. Board of Parole
Annotate this CaseFILED: December 27, 2006
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
PAUL J. MANEY,
Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION,
Respondent.
A121092
Judicial Review from Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision.
Submitted on record and briefs November 30, 2006.
Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Rebecca A. Duncan, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for petitioner. Paul Julian Maney, filed the supplemental brief pro se.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman and Ortega, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded.
PER CURIAM
Petitioner was convicted of aggravated murder in 1981 and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for a minimum of 20 years. In 2002, petitioner asked for a parole release date. The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision conducted an aggravated murder review hearing. Following that hearing, the board declined to set a release date, finding that petitioner was unlikely to be rehabilitated within a reasonable period of time. Petitioner now seeks judicial review, arguing that the board erred in failing to conduct the hearing in accordance with the contested case procedures required by ORS 163.105(3). The state concedes that, under Larsen v. Board of Parole, 206 Or App 353, 365, 138 P3d 16 (2006), petitioner is correct. We agree.
Reversed and remanded.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.