State v. Tanner

Annotate this Case

FILED: April 7, 2004

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON,

Respondent,

v. WILLIE LARON TANNER,

Appellant.

990231447; A111473

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

William C. Snouffer, Judge.

On appellant's petition for reconsideration filed February 6, 2004. Opinion filed October 22, 2003. 190 Or App 299, 78 P3d 132.

Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, and Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Jennelle Meeks Barton, Deputy Defender, Office of Public Defense Services for petition.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge,* and Leeson, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; dangerous offender sentences on counts 3, 4, 5, 6, and 10 vacated; sentence on count 9 vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

*Wollheim, J., vice Schuman, J.

PER CURIAM

Defendant seeks reconsideration of our previous decision in this case, State v. Tanner, 190 Or App 299, 78 P3d 132 (2003), arguing that we erred in affirming on an issue on which the state correctly conceded error. We agree and grant reconsideration.

Defendant was convicted of numerous felonies. The trial court imposed dangerous offender sentences under ORS 161.725(1)(b) or (c) on several Class B felonies in the absence of a jury's determination of the necessary underlying facts. As the state concedes, that action was erroneous and requires resentencing. State v. Mitchell, 84 Or App 452, 457-58, 734 P2d 379, rev den, 303 Or 590 (1987).

We adhere to our previous conclusion that the trial court erred in sentencing defendant to two upward departures on count 9, resulting in a minimum sentence of 260 months for a Class A felony that had a maximum sentence of 20 years, or 240 months. See State v. Remme, 173 Or App 546, 565-66, 23 P3d 374 (2001). We also adhere to our rejection of defendant's other assignments of error.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; dangerous offender sentences on counts 3, 4, 5, 6, and 10 vacated; sentence on count 9 vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.