State v. Fries

Annotate this Case

FILED: February 19, 2003

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON,

Respondent,

v.

GERALD LAUREN FRIES,

Appellant.

01-01-30663; A114950

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Richard C. Baldwin, Judge.

Submitted on record and briefs January 14, 2003.

Steve Lindsey filed the brief for appellant. With him on the brief was Des & Shannon Connall, LLP.

David J. Amesbury, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Kistler and Schuman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Order forfeiting firearms vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

PER CURIAM

In accordance with a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of manufacturing a controlled substance within 1000 feet of a school, ORS 475.999(1), and one count of possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(5). He appeals the portion of the sentence that ordered the forfeiture of 16 firearms that the police found during a search of his residence. The state concedes that the record is insufficient to support the forfeiture, and we agree. Former ORS 166.280(1) (1999), repealed by Or Laws 2001, ch 666, ยง 56; State v. Berg, 122 Or App 573, 857 P2d 909 (1993).

As part of the plea agreement defendant agreed that, if the trial court did not order forfeiture of the firearms, he would pay a $2,500 fine. The state suggests that we should remand the case so that the court may consider whether to modify the sentence in accordance with that agreement. Again, we agree.

Order forfeiting firearms vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.