Portland Trailer & Equipment v. A-1 Freeman Moving

Annotate this Case

FILED: June 28, 2000

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

PORTLAND TRAILER & EQUIPMENT, INC.,
an Oregon corporation;
and TOM BEASON,
an individual,

Appellants,

v.

A-1 FREEMAN MOVING & STORAGE, INC.,
an Oklahoma corporation;
and ROB F. ROBERTSON,
an individual,

Respondents.

(9805-03819; CA A104316)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Roosevelt Robinson, Judge.

On respondent Robertson's petition for reconsideration filed May 2, 2000. Opinion filed April 19, 2000, 166 Or App 651, ___ P2d ___ .

David C. Landis for petition.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Brewer, Judges.

BREWER, J.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

BREWER, J.

Pursuant to ORAP 6.25, defendant Robertson petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving, 166 Or App 651, ___P2d ___ (2000), in which we concluded that Oregon courts have personal jurisdiction over defendants pursuant to ORCP 4 L in this action. Defendant Robertson requests that we delete the bracketed language from the following sentences, 166 Or App at 653-54:

"Plaintiffs prevailed in the arbitration proceeding [and were awarded their attorney fees by the arbitrator]. Freeman requested trial de novo but ultimately dismissed the Oklahoma action without prejudice. [Under Oklahoma law, the dismissal effectively deprived plaintiffs of the attorney fees awarded by the arbitrator.]"

Plaintiffs and defendant Freeman have stipulated to the deletion. Therefore, we allow the petition and delete the language that is bracketed above.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.