State v. Marcell
Annotate this CaseFILED: September 22, 1999
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON,
Respondent,
v.
CHRISTOPHER LAMONT MARCELL,
Appellant.
(941137782; CA A89035)
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.
William J. Keys, Judge.
Argued and submitted August 24, 1999.
Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.
Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded with instructions to vacate judgment.
PER CURIAM
At oral argument the state conceded that none of the alleged predicate offenses could be used to support the racketeering conviction. See State v. Harris, 157 Or App 119, 967 P2d 909 (1998). We accept the state's concession.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to vacate judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.