IN RE: ADOPTION OF THE 2003 REVISIONS TO THE OUJI - CRIMINAL

Annotate this Case

IN RE: ADOPTION OF THE 2003 REVISIONS TO THE OUJI - CRIMINAL
2003 OK CR 15
Case Number:
Decided: 07/18/2003
IN RE: ADOPTION OF THE 2003 REVISIONS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS CRIMINAL (SECOND EDITION)

CORRECTION TO ORDER ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO OKLAHOMA
JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL (SECOND EDITION)

 

¶1 On July 3, 2003, this Court entered its Order Adopting Amendments to Oklahoma Jury Instructions-Criminal (Second Edition) with an attachment containing the revised instructions.  Upon review it has been determined that while the instructions amended are correctly listed in the order, the attachment did not contain instructions 5-106 and 6-3B; and 6-3C was mislabeled as 6-3B.

 

¶2 It is therefore ordered that the correctly titled instruction 6-3B, and the omitted instructions 5-106 and 6-3C, attached hereto, shall be made a part of the revised instructions filed of record on July 3, 2003, and published on the Court's web site, as well as provided to West Publishing Company.

 

¶3 IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2003.

 

     /s/ Charles A. Johnson
     CHARLES A. JOHNSON, Presiding Judge

 

ATTEST:

/s/ Michael S. Richie
        (Clerk)

 

OUJI-CR 5-106

LARCENY - DEFINITIONS

Appurtenance

References: Anthony v. Barton, 196 Okla. 260 , 264, 164 P.2d 642 , 645 (1945); 60 O.S. 2001, § 8; Black's Law Dictionary 94 (5th ed. 1979).

Carrying Away

References: Cunningham v. District Ct. of Tulsa Co., 432 P.2d 992 (Okl. Cr. 1967); Hutchison v. State, 427 P.2d 112 (Okl. Cr. 1967); Brinkley v. State, 60 Okl. Cr. 106, 61 P.2d 1023 (1936).

Domestic Animals

Reference: 21 O.S. Supp. 2002, § 1716 .

Dwelling

Easement

References: Story v. Hefner, 540 P.2d 562 (Okl. 1975); Frater Okla. Realty Corp. v. Allen Laughon Hdwe. Co., 206 Okl. 666 , 245 P.2d 1144 (1952); 60 O.S. 2001, § 49.

Fraud

Reference: Black's Law Dictionary 594 (5th ed. 1979).

Intent to Deprive Permanently

References: Simmons v. State, 549 P.2d 111 (Okl. Cr. 1976); Home, Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. McCollum & Co., 201 Okl. 595 , 207 P.2d 1094 (1949); R. Perkins, Criminal Law 266 (2d ed. 1969).

Intent to Steal

References: Darnell v. State, 369 P.2d 470 (Okl. Cr. 1962); 21 O.S. 2001, § 1730, referring to the definition of larceny in 21 O.S. 20011, § 1701 ; R. Perkins, Criminal Law 265 (2d ed. 1969).

Merchandise

Reference: 12A O.S. 2001, § 2-104 (1).

Nighttime

Reference: 21 O.S. 2001, § 1440 .

Of Another

Reference: Davidson v. State, 330 P.2d 607 (Okl. Cr. 1958).

Personal Property

Reference: 21 O.S. 2001, § 103 .

Right of Way

References: 60 O.S. 2001, § 50 ; Black's Law Dictionary 1191 (5th ed. 1979).

Stealth

Reference: Roach v. State, 23 Okl. Cr. 280, 214 P. 563 (1923).

Taking

References: Cunningham v. District Ct. of Tulsa Co., 432 P.2d 992 (Okl. Cr. 1967); Hutchinson v. State, 427 P.2d 112 (Okl. Cr. 1967); Brinkley v. State, 60 Okl. Cr. 106, 61 P.2d 1023 (1936).

Value

References: Gilbreath v. State, 555 P.2d 69 (Okl. 1976); Morris v. State, 491 P.2d 784 (Okl. Cr. 1971); Carson v. State, 30 Okl. Cr. 438, 236 P. 627 (1925).

Vessel

Reference: 21 O.S. 2001, § 98 .

OUJI-CR 6-3B

DRUG OFFENSES: POSSESSION OF ANHYDROUS AMMONIA IN AN UNAUTHORIZED CONTAINER WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE

 

No person may be convicted possessing anhydrous ammonia in an unauthorized container with the intent to manufacture a controlled dangerous substance unless the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the crime. These elements are:

 

First, knowingly/intentionally;

 

Second, possessing;

 

Third, anhydrous ammonia in an unauthorized container;

 

Fourth, with the intent to use the anhydrous ammonia to manufacture;

 

Fifth, the controlled dangerous substance of [Name of Controlled Dangerous Substance].

 

[You may, but are not required to, regard proof that the defendant knowingly/intentionally possessed anhydrous ammonia in an unauthorized container as sufficient evidence that the defendant intended to use the anhydrous ammonia to manufacture [Name of Controlled Dangerous Substance. The defendant's intent to use the anhydrous ammonia to manufacture [Name of Controlled Dangerous Substance] must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.]

______________________________

 

Statutory Authority: 63 O.S  2001, § 2-401 (G).

 

 

Notes on Use

 

The bracketed sentences after the elements should be included with the instruction if evidence has been introduced that the defendant possessed anhydrous ammonia in an unauthorized container.

OUJI-CR 6-3C

DRUG OFFENSES: ENDEAVORING TO MANUFACTURE - ELEMENTS

 

No person may be convicted of offering/soliciting/attempting/ endeavoring/conspiring to manufacture a controlled dangerous substance unless the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the crime. These elements are:

 

First, knowingly/intentionally;

 

Second, offering/soliciting/attempting/endeavoring/conspiring;

 

Third, to manufacture;

 

Fourth, the controlled dangerous substance of [Name of Substance].

 

______________________________

 

Statutory Authority: 63 O.S. 2001, § 2-408 .

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.