HOLT v. STATE

Annotate this Case

HOLT v. STATE
1973 OK CR 202
509 P.2d 479
Case Number: A-17762
Decided: 04/12/1973
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

An appeal from the District Court of Beckham County; Charles M. Wilson, Judge.

Johnie Holt, Appellant, was convicted for the crime of Manslaughter in the First Degree and sentenced to serve a term of twenty (20) years in the State Penitentiary, and he appeals. Judgment and sentence affirmed.

John E.T. Ivester, Sayre, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty, Gen., for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

¶1 Appellant, Johnie Holt, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged and tried in the District Court of Beckham County, Case No. CRF-72-8, for the offense of Murder. He was found guilty of the lesser offense of Manslaughter in the First Degree and his punishment was fixed at twenty (20) years imprisonment and from said judgment and sentence an appeal has been perfected to this Court. This cause was lodged in this Court on September 22, 1972. The defendant's brief was due to be filed by October 22, 1972, however, the defendant was granted an extension of time in which to file a brief until December 18, 1972. No brief was filed nor was a further extension for time in which to file brief requested. Thereafter on March 30, 1973, by order of this Court, the cause was Summarily Submitted for opinion in accordance with the rules of this Court. We have consistently held that where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, and no briefs are filed in support of the Petition in Error, this Court will examine the record only for fundamental error. If none appears on record, the judgment and sentence will be affirmed. Enoch v. Oklahoma City, Okl.Cr., 444 P.2d 856 (1968).

¶2 We have carefully examined the record and the Petition in Error and find no fundamental error. We further observe that the evidence of defendant's guilt is overwhelming. There being no apparent error in the record on appeal, it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

BLISS, P.J., concurs.

BRETT, J., concurs in result.

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.