LEONARD v. STATE

Annotate this Case

LEONARD v. STATE
1971 OK CR 91
481 P.2d 803
Case Number: A-15431
Decided: 02/24/1971
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

An appeal from the District Court of Oklahoma County; Harold C. Theus, Judge.

Donald Eugene Leonard a/k/a Johnny Leonard was convicted of the crime of Grand Larceny After Former Conviction of a Felony; was sentenced to serve six years imprisonment, and appeals. Affirmed.

Jo-Ann Fisher Corrigan, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

G.T. Blankenship, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

¶1 Donald Eugene Leonard a/k/a Johnny Leonard, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court of Oklahoma County for the offense of Grand Larceny After Former Conviction of a Felony; his punishment was fixed at six (6) years imprisonment, and from said judgment and sentence a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

¶2 The Petition in Error was filed in this Court on June 26, 1969, and the transcript was filed on December 1, 1969. The defendant requested, and was granted, four extensions of time in which to file briefs, the last extension expiring on April 27, 1970. No brief having been filed, and no further requests for application for extension of time, this case was summarily submitted on June 22, 1970, under the then existing Rule 9 of this Court which provided:

"When briefs are not filed or when an appearance is not made, the cause will be submitted and examined for fundamental error only."

¶3 We have carefully examined the Petition in Error and the transcript. We are of the opinion that the record is free of fundamental error and that the defendant received a fair and impartial trial, and that the punishment imposed is well within the range provided by law.

¶4 We are, therefore, of the opinion that the judgment and sentence should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.