TERPENING v. PAGE

Annotate this Case

TERPENING v. PAGE
1968 OK CR 16
437 P.2d 273
Case Number: A-14515
Decided: 01/24/1968
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

Willard Terpening, pro se.

G.T. Blankenship, Atty. Gen., Hugh H. Collum, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge:

¶1 This is an original proceedings in which the petitioner, Willard Terpening, seeks a writ of habeas corpus from this Court for his release, alleging that because he was represented by court-appointed counsel, he was denied effective counsel.

¶2 The State has filed a Demurrer, for the reason that the petition fails to state a cause of action and does not state facts sufficient to support this allegation.

¶3 After reading the petition presented to this Court, we are of the opinion that the State's Demurrer should be sustained.

¶4 The writ prayed for is, accordingly, denied.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.