WINGFIELD v. PAGE

Annotate this Case

WINGFIELD v. PAGE
1966 OK CR 166
422 P.2d 229
Case Number: A-14135
Decided: 12/21/1966
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

Billy Jack Wingfield, petitioner, pro se.

Charles Nesbitt, Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma, Hugh H. Collum, First Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

¶1 This matter comes on application of Billy Jack Wingfield for a writ of habeas corpus discharging him from custody in the State Penitentiary, where he is currently confined under authority of a judgment and sentence rendered against him in the District Court of Tulsa County, case No. 18978. The Court having examined the petition and time computation and the Response filed on behalf of the State, and being of the opinion that petitioner is not entitled to credit for time served in federal custody, finds that the allegations of petitioner are wholly insufficient to support his assertion that he has completed service of the sentence imposed in the District Court of Tulsa County, case No. 18978.

¶2 It is therefore the order of the Court that the relief prayed for should be, and the same is hereby, denied, and the application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.