CAVES v. HILBERT

Annotate this Case

CAVES v. HILBERT
1950 OK CR 104
222 P.2d 169
92 Okl.Cr. 175
Case Number: A-11445
Decided: 09/06/1950
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Syllabus in Case of Hill v. Hilbert, Adopted. This is a companion case to the case of Hill v. Hilbert, 92 Okla. Cr. 169, 222 P.2d 166. The syllabus of that case is adopted as the syllabus in this case.

Original action in habeas corpus by Jewel Caves. Writ granted.

Sid White, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Howard V. Cudd, Asst. Municipal Counselor, Oklahoma City, for respondent.

JONES, P.J.

This is a companion to the case of Hill v. Hilbert, 92 Okla. Cr. 169, 222 P.2d 166. The facts are detailed at length in the opinion of Hill v. Hilbert and will not be further elaborated.

The cases were consolidated for the purpose of hearing and at the conclusion of the hearing an order was made discharging the petitioner Jewel Caves from imprisonment, the same as was done with the petitioner Benton Hill. The reasoning of the court in disposing of the contention of petitioner in Hill v. Hilbert, supra, apply with equal force to the contention raised by Jewel Caves.

The action of the police judge in directing that petitioner be held for tests by the venereal clinic was arbitrary and oppressive under the facts presented to us and she is entitled to her discharge.

It is so ordered.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.

Page 176

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.