McEllison v State

Annotate this Case

McEllison v State
1945 OK CR 109
162 P.2d 785
81 Okl.Cr. 235
Decided: 10/17/1945
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

1. Prostitution-Insufficiency of Evidence to Sustain Charge. Where one was charged with unlawfully making an offer to secure another for the purpose of prostitution, evidence examined and held insufficient to sustain the charge.

2. Trial-Instructions of Court as to Punishment Under Statute-Punishment Left to Court on Failure of Jury to Agree. Where the statute provides the punishment to be assessed, it is the duty of the court to instruct the jury as to the punishment, and they may then be instructed that if they are unable to agree that the punishment may be left for the court to assess.

Appeal from County Court, Garfield County; Paul Edwards, Judge.

Westley McEllison was convicted in the county court of Garfield County of the crime of unlawfully making an offer to one to secure another for the purpose of prostitution, and sentenced to a term of four months in the county jail, and to pay a fine of $41.60, and he appeals. Reversed.

Dan Mitchell, of Enid, for plaintiff in error.

Randell S. Cobb, Atty. Gen., Jess L. Pullen, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harry McKeever, Co. Atty., of Enid, for defendant in error.

BAREFOOT, P. J. Defendant, Westley McEllison, was charged, by amended information, in the county court of Garfield county, with the crime of "unlawfully making an offer to one Sergeant Thompson to secure another, to wit: * * *, for the purpose of prostitution with said Sergeant Thompson"; was tried, convicted and sentenced by the court to serve a term of four months in the county jail, and to pay $41.60 costs, and has appealed.

This is a companion case to that of Dunham v. State, reported in 81 Okla. Cr. 205, 162 P.2d 332.

Page 236

The facts herein are identical with the facts in the above mentioned case, and for the reasons stated therein, the case must be reversed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.