Ex parte Kirk

Annotate this Case

Ex parte Kirk
1943 OK CR 32
135 P.2d 65
76 Okl.Cr. 155
Decided: 03/10/1943
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

1. Pardon-Clemency Power Vested Exclusively in Governor. Under the provisions of article 6, sec. 10, Oklahoma Constitution, the power to grant clemency after conviction is vested exclusively in the Governor.

2. Habeas Corpus-Writ Denied Where Matters Alleged Do not Affect Validity of Judgment of Conviction. Where petition for writ of habeas corpus alleges matters which do not affect the validity of the judgment rendered against petitioner, but are solely questions of clemency which properly should be addressed to the Governor, the writ of habeas corpus will be denied.

Original habeas corpus proceeding by Bill Kirk to secure his release from the State Penitentiary. Writ denied.

Bill Kirk, in pro. per.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

JONES, P. J. This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus by Bill Kirk to secure his release from the State Penitentiary at McAlester where he was

Page 156

committed from Tulsa county to serve a term of 35 years for the crime of robbery with firearms.

The only contention presented by petitioner is that the sentence assessed petitioner is excessive and in that connection alleges that a codefendant received a much lesser sentence and was paroled after serving three years. The petition further recites that petitioner has served ten years of the assessed judgment and should be released from custody.

Attached to the petition are a large number of letters recommending that the defendant be released.

There are no facts related in the petition which would give this court jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed. The question raised is purely one of clemency. In Oklahoma, by the provision of our Constitution, article 6, sec. 10, the power to grant clemency after conviction is vested solely in the Governor. The jurisdiction of this court in habeas corpus matters is limited strictly to those cases where the judgment and sentence rendered against petitioner is clearly void.

The writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.