Lee v State

Annotate this Case

Lee v State
1937 OK CR 119
70 P.2d 1111
62 Okl.Cr. 204
Decided: 08/05/1937
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Intoxicating Liquors-Conviction for Transporting not Sustained.

Appeal from County Court, Kiowa County; J. S. Carpenter, Judge.

Keiner Lee was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor and he appeals. Reversed.

Homer Windle, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Paul Y. Cunningham, Co. Atty., for the State.

PER CURIAM. The plaintiff in error, hereinafter for convenience referred to as the defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county on a charge of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment

Page 205

fixed by the jury at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for 60 days.

The evidence of the state shows that a party living near Lone Wolf, in Kiowa county, drove into Hobart and advised the officers there was a car out on the road, with a man in the car; the officers drove out on the road, and found the car by the side of the road with the defendant in the car; the officers say they stopped and asked the defendant what was the trouble and defendant replied he could not get his car started, and that the officer got out of his car and tried to start the car and could not, and Joe Walker, another officer, got out of the car he was in and tried to start the car, and in doing so he struck his foot against a sack in the car and discovered it was filled with fruit jars containing, whisky. The officers arrested the defendant and put him in jail.

Both the officers admit that from the time they first saw the car and defendant and took him into custody and brought him to town, the car which the defendant was in when they first saw him was not moved. There is not a word in the testimony showing that the defendant moved the car from where the officers first saw it until he was arrested. The charge in this case is transporting intoxicating liquor. The foregoing is in substance all of the state's evidence. Wicker v. State, 47 Okla. Cr. 358, 288 Pac. 398.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.