Heath v State

Annotate this Case

Heath v State
1934 OK CR 67
32 P.2d 955
56 Okl.Cr. 25
Decided: 05/18/1934
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error - Trial Court After Case-Made Settled and Signed and Filed in Trial Court not Authorized to Grant Further Time for Filing in Reviewing Court. Case-made, when settled, signed, attested, and filed, passes beyond trial court's control; orders below granting additional time to file case-made in reviewing court held void, where court had previously settled and signed case-made and it had been attested and filed. Section 3192, Okla. Stat. 1931.

Appeal from County Court, Logan County; C. Emory Smith, Judge.

Noble Heath was convicted of an offense, and he appeals. Appeal dismissed.

E.S. Lowther, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., and Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

EDWARDS, P.J. Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Logan county and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 60 days in the county jail. Judgment was rendered on the 28th day of October, at which time the court allowed the defendant 60 days to make and serve case-made and the case-made was served on December 15, and on the same day was settled and signed and filed in the county court, but the appeal was not lodged in this court till February 20, more than 60 days from the date of the judgment. No order extending time to file the appeal in this court was made until December 20, after the case had been settled and signed and filed in the county court. It has been many times held by this court that when the judge of the trial court has settled and signed the case-made

Page 26

and it has been attested and filed in the clerk's office, it has passed beyond the control of the trial judge and therefore cannot be amended, altered, or changed by any order of his. Sutton v. State, 51 Okla. Cr. 95, 299 P. 928. See, also, Wilson v. State, 24 Okla. Cr. 268, 217 P. 1057.

The appeal is dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.