Barber v State

Annotate this Case

Barber v State
1931 OK CR 397
2 P.2d 975
52 Okl.Cr. 62
Decided: 09/05/1931
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error Affirmance in Absence of Brief. Where an appeal has been taken from a conviction, and no brief is filed, this court will examine the record, and, if no fundamental errors were committed, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Appeal from County Court, Jackson County; S.N. Starnes, Judge.

Bill Barber was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Clay Snodgrass, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM. The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Jackson county of the crime of selling intoxicating liquors, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $75 and serve a term of 45 days in the county jail, and has appealed.

The petition in error and transcript of the record were filed in this court on January 9, 1931. No further appearance has been made by the plaintiff in error, nor any further extension of time asked in which to file brief in support of the assignments of error.

We have carefully examined the record, and find the information properly charges the offense. The defendant was accorded a fair and impartial trial. No fundamental

Page 63

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.