Holland v State

Annotate this Case

Holland v State
1931 OK CR 321
300 P. 745
51 Okl.Cr. 285
Decided: 07/11/1931
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Larceny Conviction for Theft of Automobile Sustained.

Appeal from District Court, Washington County; J.R. Charlton, Judge.

Charles Holland was convicted of larceny of an automobile, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Campbell & Ray, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., and Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

EDWARDS, J. The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Washington county of larceny of an automobile and was sentenced to serve a term of five years in the state penitentiary.

Page 286

The record discloses that, at the time charged, defendant took an automobile belonging to one Ballard which was parked in front of the Elks Club in Bartlesville and started to drive it to Pawhuska. He drove it several miles in the country, ran it into a ditch, and abandoned it. He testified that he was drunk and thought that the car belonged to one Pratt and that he had Pratt's permission to drive it. Pratt was not a witness. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.