Washington v State

Annotate this Case

Washington v State
1931 OK CR 175
297 P. 1059
50 Okl.Cr. 346
Decided: 04/11/1931
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error Affirmance in Absence of Brief or Oral Argument.

Appeal from District Court, Creek County; Fred A. Speakman, Judge.

Roy Washington was convicted of murder, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Gaylord R. Wilcox, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.

CHAPPELL, J. Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Creek county of the crime of murder, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for his natural life.

Page 347

No briefs have been filed by the defendant, and no appearance made for oral argument. We have read the evidence, and found the same sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

We have examined the pleadings, the instructions of the court, the verdict of the jury, and the judgment of the court thereon, and find the same to be regular and legal in all respects.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.