Cargill v State

Annotate this Case

Cargill v State
1930 OK CR 230
288 P. 987
48 Okl.Cr. 59
Decided: 05/17/1930
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal and Error Review Affirmance Where no Briefs Filed.

Appeal from District Court, Hughes County; R.D. Hudson, Judge.

H.E. Cargill was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Tom Payne, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., for the State.

DAVENPORT, J. The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of grand larceny, and sentenced to serve a term of two years in the penitentiary. From the judgment, the defendant has appealed to this court.

The sentence was imposed upon the defendant on the 8th day of September, 1928; petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on the 6th day of March, 1929. No brief has been filed in support of the errors assigned, nor has there been any personal appearance or argument submitted in support of the assignments.

Page 60

The record has been carefully examined in this case, and we find that the information was sufficient to charge an offense of grand larceny, that the testimony is sufficient to show the defendant guilty, and that the defendant was accorded a fair and impartial trial.

Where no brief is filed, and no personal appearance made, the court presumes that the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.