McClure v State

Annotate this Case

McClure v State
1925 OK CR 329
237 P. 146
31 Okl.Cr. 76
Decided: 06/22/1925
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Intoxicating Liquors Evidence Sustaining Conviction for Unlawful Possession.

Appeal from County Court, Ottawa County; Wm. M. Thomas, Judge.

Tom McClure was convicted of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Burns & Turner, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.

DOYLE, J. Plaintiff in error, Tom McClure, was convicted on a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in jail to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals, but no brief has been filed, and no appearance made on his behalf in this court. The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the evidence, and that the court erred in refusing requested instructions.

This conviction is based on the undisputed testimony of one witness, Bonnie Turner, who testified that she saw the defendant, Tom McClure, and his co-defendant, Claude Brown, in a Studebaker car driven by the defendant, McClure, near the smelter at Hockerville, and her husband bought a bottle of liquor from Claude Brown; that she noticed other bottles loose in the car.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the instructions fairly state the law applicable to the case, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

BESSEY, P.J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.