Kiggins v State

Annotate this Case

Kiggins v State
1918 OK CR 182
176 P. 413
15 Okl.Cr. 306
Case Number: A-3051
Decided: 12/14/1918
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

EDNA KIGGINS
v.
STATE.

CRIMINAL LAW--Instruction--Reasonable Doubt.

Appeal from County Court, Payne County; Wilberforce Jones, Judge.

Edna Kiggins was convicted of petit larceny, and she appeals. Reversed.

Freeman E. Miller, for plaintiff in error.

R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Page 306

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Edna Kiggins, and Rebecca Couch were jointly informed against for the

Page 307

offense of petit larceny. They were jointly tried. The jury rendered their verdict finding Rebecca Couch not guilty and finding Edna Kiggins guilty as charged and assessing her punishment at a fine of $ 50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, she appealed by filing in this court on June 15, 1917, a petition in error with case-made. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error in part as follows:

"Two errors occurred in the trial of the cause that we think, under the former holdings of this court, should and will reverse the same. The first one is the denial of the court to give to the jury instructions Nos. 5 and 6 requested by defendant. These instructions go to the fact that there might have been an accident or a misunderstanding that caused the hotel's property to be packed in that of the moving defendant. The other one is because the court told the jury, in instruction No. 6, that if they had a reasonable doubt as to the guilt 'or innocence' of the defendant they must acquit. This instruction is contrary to the law as laid down by this court in a number of cases, the last being Findley v. State,

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.