Freeley v State

Annotate this Case

Freeley v State
1910 OK CR 136
109 P. 239
4 Okl.Cr. 21
Case Number: No. A-566
Decided: 05/26/1910
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

APPEAL Time Extension.

Page 22

Appeal from Comanche County Court; James H. Wolverton, Judge.

W.M. Freeley was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. Dismissed.

H.S. Davis, for plaintiff in error.

Fred S. Caldwell, for the State.

PER CURIAM. The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Comanche county for the crime of unlawfully having in his possession intoxicating liquors for the purpose and intent of unlawfully selling the same, and was on the 22d day of October, 1909, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days and to pay a fine of $50 and costs, from which judgment and sentence an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on January 21, 1910, a petition in error with case-made attached. On March 29, 1910, on behalf of the state there was filed a motion to strike case-made and dismiss appeal, for the reason that this court has no jurisdiction thereof, in that the judgment from which this appeal was presented was rendered on the 22d day of November, 1909, and the case-made was not filed in this court until the 21st day of January, 1910. To this motion no response has been filed.

Section 6948, Snyder's Statutes, provides as follows:

"In misdemeanor cases the appeal must be taken within sixty days after the judgment is rendered: Provided, however, that the trial court or judge may, for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken not exceeding sixty days."

The record shows that the court allowed the defendant 30 days in which to make and serve a case-made for the Criminal Court of Appeals, and 5 days thereafter to suggest amendments thereto, said case to be signed and settled within 5 days' notice by either party to the other in writing, which order was made a part of the original judgment. The record further shows that on the 22d day of November, 1909, the court made an order granting an extension of 30 days in which to make and serve a case-made. The record further shows that the case-made was served on the

Page 23

24th day of December, 1909, and without further order of the court signed and settled on the 4th day of January, 1910, and not filed in this court until the 21st day of January, 1910.

Where an appeal in a misdemeanor case is not perfected within 60 days from the rendition of the judgment, the record must show a proper order made by the trial court or judge thereof before the expiration of the first 60 days, extending the time in which the appeal may be taken; otherwise, the appeal will be dismissed. That was not done in this case. There is nothing in the record before us to confer upon this court jurisdiction to consider the appeal. The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore be sustained.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.