In re K.R.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as In re K.R., 2010-Ohio-5530.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF: K.R. : : CASE NO. CA2010-06-152 : DECISION 11/15/2010 : : APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case No. JN2009-0131 Heather A. Felerski, P.O. Box 181342, Fairfield, Ohio 45018, for appellant, E.R. Robin N. Piper III, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Shannon Haferkamp, th Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11 Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011-6057, for appellee, Butler County Department of Jobs & Family Services Helen M. Kendrick, 8050 Beckett Center Drive, Suite 202, West Chester, Ohio 45069, Guardian Ad Litem for K.R. Mary Lou Kusel, 6 South Second Street, Suite 720, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, Guardian Ad Litem for appellant, E.R. Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original Butler CA2010-06-152 papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived. {¶2} Counsel for appellant, E.R., has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous. YOUNG, P.J., POWELL and RINGLAND, JJ., concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
