State v. Fugate
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Fugate, 2004-Ohio-182.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, : : CASE NO. CA2003-03-074 : O P I N I O N 1/20/2004 -vs: ROBERT D. FUGATE, Defendant-Appellant. : : CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2002-11-1790 Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Daniel G. Eichel, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45012-0515, for plaintiff-appellee Scott N. Blauvelt, 311 Key Bank Building, 6 S. Second Street, Hamilton, OH 45011, for defendant-appellant POWELL, J. {¶1} Defendant-appellant, Robert Fugate, appeals the decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas sentencing him to two years in prison for escape. decision. We affirm the common pleas court's {¶2} In November 2002, appellant was indicted on one count of escape in violation of R.C. 2921.34(A)(1). The indictment stated that the offense was a third-degree felony. The indictment stemmed from appellant's apparent failure to report to his parole officer. In March 2003, appellant pled guilty to the third-degree felony escape charge. The common pleas court subsequently convicted appellant and sentenced him to two years in prison. {¶3} Appellant now appeals his sentence, assigning one error as follows: {¶4} "THE TRIAL COURT ERRED TO THE PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT- APPELLANT BY SENTENCING HIM FOR A THIRD DEGREE FELONY OFFENSE WHERE THE INDICTMENT CHARGED A FIRST DEGREE MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE." {¶5} In his sole assignment of error, appellant argues that the facts alleged in the indictment only constituted a first-degree misdemeanor offense of escape. Therefore, appellant argues, the common pleas court could only sentence him for the first-degree misdemeanor offense. {¶6} We overrule appellant's sole assignment of error. The record clearly shows that appellant pled guilty to third-degree felony escape. Nothing in the record indicates that appellant's guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given. Additionally, nothing in the record indicates that appellant raised the alleged defect in the indictment prior to entering his guilty plea. Therefore, appellant waived any error with respect to the indictment by pleading guilty to the thirddegree felony offense alleged in the indictment. See State v. Hedgecock (May 11, 1998), Fayette App. No. CA97-08-022; State v. Lopez, Greene App. No. 99-CA-120, 2003-Ohio-3974, ¶14; State v. Rogers (Mar. 23, 1994), Adams App. No. 548. Accordingly, the common pleas court did not err in sentencing appellant for the third-degree felony offense to which he pled guilty. {¶7} Judgment affirmed. VALEN, P.J., and YOUNG, J., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
