Buice v. Wadsworth

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Buice v. Wadsworth, 2002-Ohio-2413.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY DIERDRE CLENDENEN BUICE, : : CASE NO. CA2002-01-020 (Accelerated Calendar) : Plaintiff-Appellee, JUDGMENT ENTRY 5/20/2002 - vs : WILLIAM EDWARD WADSWORTH, Defendant-Appellant. : : APPEAL FROM COMMON PLEAS COURT, DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION {¶1} Defendant-appellant, William Edward Wadsworth, appeals a decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, affirming the report of a magistrate.1 {¶2} Appellant submits ten assignments of error, all of which are directed to the trial court's decision to adopt a magistrate's report concerning child support payments. {¶3} The assignments of error are overruled since appellant, as the party objecting to the magistrate's report, failed to provide the trial court with a transcript of proceedings by which it could make findings independent of the report. State ex rel. 1. Pursuant to Loc.R. 6(A), we have sua sponte assigned this appeal to the accelerated calendar. Butler CA2002-01-020 Duncan v. Chippewa Twp. Trustees, 73 Ohio St.3d 728, 1995-Ohio272. Under such circumstances, appellate review is limited to a determination of whether the trial court's decision constituted an abuse of discretion. Id. us, of we find no abuse Having reviewed the record before discretion by the trial court. Accordingly, appellant's assignments of error are overruled and the trial court's judgment is affirmed. {¶4} Pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E), this entry shall not be relied upon as authority and will not be published in any form. A certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. {¶5} Costs to be taxed in compliance with App.R. 24. __________________________________ Stephen W. Powell, Presiding Judge __________________________________ William W. Young, Judge __________________________________ Anthony Valen, Judge - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.