Leavell v. Conway
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Leavell v. Conway, 2017-Ohio-8346.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Douglas Leavell Court of Appeals No. E-17-044 Relator v. Visiting Judge James Conway Respondent DECISION AND JUDGMENT Decided: October 24, 2017 ***** Douglas Leavell, pro se. ***** JENSEN, P.J. {¶ 1} Relator, Douglas Leavell, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against respondent, Hon. James Conway. In the petition, relator requests that the court issue a writ of mandamus, pursuant to R.C. Chapter 2731, ordering respondent to rule on several motions that are pending in two cases to which relator is a party, Nos. 2013-CR-0344 and 2014-CR-0389. {¶ 2} We previously issued an alternative writ directing respondent, within 14 days of the date he was served with the alternative writ, to either do the act requested by relator in the petition or show cause why he is not required to do the act by filing an answer to relator’s petition pursuant to Civ.R. 8(B) or a motion to dismiss relator’s petition pursuant to Civ.R. 12. It is now well beyond the 14-day time period and respondent has failed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss. {¶ 3} In light of respondent’s failure to respond to the alternative writ, this court issues a peremptory writ of mandamus pursuant to R.C. 2731.10 and orders that respondent rule on all pending motions in case Nos. 2013-CR-0344 and 2014-CR-0389. {¶ 4} Writ Granted. Costs assessed to respondent. {¶ 5} To the clerk: Manner of service. {¶ 6} The clerk of court, whom the court hereby specially authorizes to perfect service in this case, shall immediately serve, upon the respondent by personal service, a copy of this peremptory writ pursuant to R.C. 2731.08, and the clerk shall verify, by affidavit, the time, place, and manner of service and file such verification upon completion of the service. {¶ 7} The clerk is further directed to immediately serve upon all other parties a copy of this peremptory writ in a manner prescribed by Civ.R. 5(B). {¶ 8} It is so ordered. Writ granted. 2. Leavell v. Conway C.A. No. E-17-044 Mark L. Pietrykowski, J. _______________________________ JUDGE Arlene Singer, J. James D. Jensen, P.J. CONCUR. _______________________________ JUDGE _______________________________ JUDGE 3.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
