State v. Albelo
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Albelo, 2006-Ohio-1228.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-05-1147 Appellee Trial Court No. CR-2004-1660 v. Eliezer Albelo DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Appellant Decided: March 17, 2006 ***** Julia R. Bates, Prosecuting Attorney, and Bruce J. Sorg, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Veronica M. Murphy, for appellant. ***** PIETRYKOWSKI, J. {¶1} Defendant-appellant, Eliezer Albelo, appeals the September 17, 2004 judgment entry of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas which, following a plea of guilty pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford (1970), 400 U.S. 25, sentenced appellant to four years of imprisonment for possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11(A) and (C)(4)(d). Appellant raises the following assignment of error: {¶2} "The trial court's sentence was contrary to law and violated appellant's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution." {¶3} Upon review, we find that this case is controlled by the Supreme Court of Ohio's decision in State v. Foster, ___ Ohio St.3d. ___, 2006-Ohio-856. In Foster, the court held that R.C. 2929.14(B) violates the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to Blakely v. Washington (2004), 542 U.S. 296, and Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), 530 U.S. 466. Because the trial court relied on an unconstitutional statute when sentencing appellant, we find that the sentence is void and must be vacated. Foster at ¶ 103-104. Accordingly, appellant's sole assignment of error is found welltaken. {¶4} On consideration whereof, we find that the judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is reversed and appellant's sentence is vacated. The matter is remanded to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing in accordance with Foster, supra. The state is ordered to pay the costs of this appeal pursuant to App.R. 24. Judgment for the clerk's expense incurred in preparation of the record, fees allowed by law, and the fee for filing the appeal is awarded to Lucas County. JUDGMENT REVERSED. 2. State of Ohio v. Eliezer Albelo L-05-1147 A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. See, also, 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 4, amended 1/1/98. Peter M. Handwork, J. _______________________________ JUDGE Mark L. Pietrykowski, J. Dennis M. Parish, J. CONCUR. _______________________________ JUDGE _______________________________ JUDGE This decision is subject to further editing by the Supreme Court of Ohio's Reporter of Decisions. Parties interested in viewing the final reported version are advised to visit the Ohio Supreme Court's web site at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/newpdf/?source=6. 3.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
