State v. Adams
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Adams, 2003-Ohio-1034.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WD-02-035 Appellee Trial Court No. 01-CR-305 v. Corey J. Adams Appellant DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Decided: March 7, 2003 * * * * * Raymond C. Fisher, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jacqueline M. Kirian and Gwen Howe-Gebers, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee. Jeffrey M. Gamso, for appellant. * * * * * SINGER, J. {¶1} This matter is before the court on appeal from the judgment and sentence of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas which, following a no contest plea, found appellant, Corey Adams, guilty of aggravated vehicular homicide, a violation of R.C. 2903.06(A)(1)(B)(1)(a) and a felony of the first degree. {¶2} Appellant raises the following assignment of error: {¶3} "The sentence imposed by the trial court was contrary to law as it was inconsistent with sentences imposed in similar cases and was not supported by the findings mandated by R.C. 2929.14(B)." {¶4} The relevant facts of this appeal are as follows. On July 20, 2001, 21 old Adams was driving a 1989 Ford XLT Ranger on State Route 65 in Perrysburg Township, Ohio when he collided head on with a vehicle being driven by Joanne Cline. instantly and her two Witnesses reported passengers seeing sustained appellant's center several times before impact. Cline was killed serious vehicle travel injuries. left of Adams' blood-alcohol content following the accident tested at a level of .216 or twice the legal limit. {¶5} On September 20, 2001, Adams was indicted on one count of aggravated vehicular homicide. Following his no contest plea the trial court found Adams guilty and sentenced him to eight years in prison. The minimum prison term for a first-degree felony is three years. R.C. 2929.14(A)(1). On appeal, Adams contends that his sentence is inconsistent with sentences imposed in similar cases. Adams also contends that his sentence is not supported by the findings mandated by R.C. 2929.14(B). {¶6} R.C. 2929.14(B) mandates that "if the court imposing a sentence upon an offender for a felony elects or is required to impose a prison term on the offender and if the offender previously has not served a prison term, the court shall impose the shortest prison term authorized for the offense pursuant to division (A) of this section, unless the court finds on the record that the shortest prison term will demean the seriousness of the offender's conduct or will not adequately protect the public from future crime by the offender or others." In other words, the record must clearly reflect "that the trial court first considered imposing the minimum *** sentence and then decided to depart from that based on one or both of the permitted reasons." State v. Jones, 93 Ohio St.3d 391, 398, 2001-Ohio-1341, citing State v. Edmonson, 86 Ohio St.3d 324, 1999-Ohio-110. {¶7} Under R.C. 2953.08(A)(4), an offender has an appeal of right from a sentence that is contrary to law. imposed minus appealable as the necessary being findings "contrary to of law." R.C. Griffin A sentence 2929.14(B) & Katz, is Ohio Felony Sentencing Law (1999) 531, fn. 21. {¶8} At the time of sentencing, Adams had never served a prison term. case failed The state concedes that the trial court in this to make the anywhere in the record. confirmation in this R.C. 2929.14(B) required findings Without said findings, there is no record that the court first considered imposing the minimum three-year sentence and then decided to depart from the statutorily mandated minimum based on one or both of the permitted reasons. court's failure to State v. Edmonson, supra. sufficiently state findings requires remand for resentencing. the R.C. A trial 2929.14(B) See State v. Kingdom, (Jan. 31, 2003), 6th Dist. No. L-02-1092. {¶9} Finding Adams' sentence to be contrary to law, we need not, at this time, compare his sentence to other imposed on similar offenders for similar crimes. sentences Adams' sole assignment of error is found well-taken. {¶10} On consideration whereof, we find that the judgment of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas is reversed, appellant's sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. Costs of this appeal are assessed to appellee. JUDGMENT REVERSED. KNEPPER and PIETRYKOWSKI, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
