Gass v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Gass v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2002-Ohio-3966.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Donna Gass Court of Appeals No. L-02-1032 Appellant Trial Court No. CI-00-3950 v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Appellee Decided: August 2, 2002 * * * * * Steven L. Crossmock and Charles E. Boyk, for appellant. Russell W. Porritt II, for appellee. * * * * * SHERCK, J. {¶1} insurer This is an appeal from a summary judgment issued to an who denied a homeowner's policy holder uninsured/ underinsured motorist's coverage. {¶2} Pursuant to 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 12(C), we sua sponte transfer this matter to our accelerated docket and, hereby, render our decision. {¶3} On authority of Stevens v. Allstate Ins. Co., 6th Dist. No. L-02-1003, 2002-Ohio-3044; Ruiz v. Rygalski, 6th Dist. No. L01-1363, 2002-Ohio-1519; Westmark v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Columbus, Inc., 6th Dist. No. F-01-18, 2002-Ohio-1524; and Burkholder v. German Mut. Ins. Co., 6th Dist No. L-01-1413, 2002-Ohio-1184, the judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Costs to appellant. {¶4} We further find, as we have previously, that our holding is in direct conflict with Lemm v. The Hartford (Oct. 4, 2001), Franklin App. No. 01AP-251, which is currently before the Ohio Supreme Court for its consideration. 93 Ohio St.3d 1475. Lemm v. The Hartford (2001), As such, we respectfully certify this case to the Ohio Supreme Court, pursuant to Art. IV, Section 3(B)(4), Ohio Constitution, for review and final determination on the following issue: {¶5} "When a homeowner's insurance policy provides express liability for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident when the injured party is the homeowner's residence employee and the injury occurred in the course of that employment, is the policy deemed an automobile liability or motor vehicle policy subject to the requirement of former R.C. 3937.18 to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage?" JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. 2. Melvin L. Resnick, J. ____________________________ JUDGE James R. Sherck, J. Richard W. Knepper, J. CONCUR. ____________________________ JUDGE ____________________________ JUDGE 3.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
