State ex rel. Bunnell v. Lucas Cty. Court of Common Pleas
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Bunnell v. Lucas Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 2002-Ohio-240.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF LUCAS COUNTY State, ex rel. Darnae Bunnell Court of Appeals No. L-01-1502 Petitioner v. Lucas County Common Pleas Court, Judge Charles Wittenberg DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Respondent Decided: January 23, 2002 * * * * * Darnae Bunnell, pro se. * * * * * HANDWORK, J. {ΒΆ1} Darnae mandamus. Bunnell has filed a petition for a writ of 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 6 provides, in pertinent part: "An original action, other than habeas corpus, shall be instituted by the filing of an original and three copies of a complaint. The petitioner or relator shall also file a praecipe directing the clerk of the court of appeals to serve a copy of the complaint on each other party at the addresses listed in the praecipe." praecipe was filed by Bunnell. No Accordingly, this court orders that the petition for mandamus is dismissed for failure to comply with 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 6. Costs assessed to Bunnell. WRIT DISMISSED. Peter M. Handwork, J. ____________________________ JUDGE Richard W. Knepper, J. Mark L. Pietrykowski, P.J. CONCUR. ____________________________ JUDGE ____________________________ JUDGE 2.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
