Izor v. Izor
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Izor v. Izor, 2008-Ohio-6042.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHEILA D. IZOR Plaintiff-Appellant v. RANDALL L. IZOR Defendant-Appellee : : : : : : : : : : Appellate Case No. 22492 Trial Court Case No. 04-DR-1198 (Civil Appeal from Common Pleas (Court, Domestic Relations) ........... OPINION Rendered on the 21st day of November, 2008 ........... SHEILA D. IZOR, P.O. Box 535, Verona, Ohio 45378 Plaintiff-Appellant, pro se RANDALL IZOR, 497 South Diamond Mill Road, New Lebanon, Ohio 45345 Defendant-Appellee, pro se ............. BROGAN, J. {¶ 1} Sheila Izor appeals from the judgment of divorce granted to her and her former husband, Randall, on October 18, 2007. Although Sheila was represented below, she has pursued this appeal without legal representation. {¶ 2} Sheila did not file a transcript of the proceedings below but now attempts to argue that many of the findings made by the trial court were against 2 the manifest weight of the evidence presented below. It is fundamental, however, that we cannot review evidentiary findings of a trial court in the absence of a transcript. Ostrander v. Parker-Fallis Insulation Co. (1972), 29 Ohio St.2d 72. The court in Ostrander noted that the court of appeals was correct in stating in the absence of a complete bill of exceptions, this court has no alternative but to indulge the presumption of the regularity of the proceedings and the validity of the judgment in the trial court. Id. At 74. The Judgment of the trial court is Affirmed. .......... FAIN, J., and GRADY, J., concur. Copies mailed to: Sheila D. Izor Randall Izor William D. Meily Hon. Denise L. Cross
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
