State v. Maiolo
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Maiolo, 2003-Ohio-6542.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. Case No. 2002-CA-86 vs. : T.C. Case No. 99-CR-61 JAMES T. MAIOLO : (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Defendant-Appellant : ........... OPINION Rendered on the 26th day of November , 2003. ........... DAVID E. SMITH, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Clark County Prosecutor s Office, P.O. Box 1608, Springfield, Ohio 45501 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee CHARLES W. SLICER, III, Atty. Reg. #0059927, 111 W. First Street, Suite 401, Dayton, Ohio 45402 Attorney for Defendant-Appellant ............. PER CURIAM: {ΒΆ1} Appellant entered into negotiated pleas to robbery and forgery for a two year sentence and a nine month sentence to be served concurrently. He was also sentenced to a 2 year prison term for the forgery resulting from his conviction after a jury trial in 02-CR-68 which was the subject of the appeal in this court s case number 2002-CA-87. Appellant requests in a single assignment that he be 2 resentenced in the event we should reverse his forgery conviction in 02-CR-68. Since we affirmed his conviction in 02-CR-68, appellant is entitled to no relief and his assignment of error is overruled. Judgment Affirmed. ........... BROGAN, J., WOLFF, J., and YOUNG, J., concur. Copies mailed to: David E. Smith Charles W. Slicer, III Hon. Richard O Neill
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
