Norwood v. Robinson

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Norwood v. Robinson, 2001-Ohio-4012.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO CITY OF NORWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, : APPEAL NO. C-010307 TRIAL NO. M-01TRD-9629 : JUDGMENT ENTRY. vs. RICHARD ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. : : : This appeal, considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, is not controlling authority except as provided in S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 2(G)(1). Defendant-appellant, Richard Robinson, appeals the judgment of the Hamilton County Municipal Court convicting him of disregarding a traffic signal in violation of Norwood Codified Ordinance 313.01, a minor misdemeanor. In his first assignment of error, Robinson argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for a continuance so that he could obtain a bill of particulars. In his second assignment of error, he argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for a continuance so that he could seek the advice of counsel. OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS We find no merit in the assignments. The transcript of the trial has not been made a part of the record on appeal in accordance with App.R. 9.1 Therefore, the record does not demonstrate that Robinson requested a continuance or that the trial court overruled a request. Because the record does not reflect the errors that Robinson assigns, we overrule both assignments of error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24. GORMAN, P.J., HILDEBRANDT and PAINTER, JJ. To the Clerk: Enter upon the Journal of the Court on December 19, 2001 per order of the Court _______________________________. Presiding Judge 1 The record also does not contain a motion for a bill of particulars. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.