Bates v. [Respondent]
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Bates v. [Respondent], 2020-Ohio-5022.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BRIAN BATES Petitioner -vs- JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P. J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J. Case No. 20 COA 027 Respondent OPINION CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus JUDGMENT: Dismissed DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: October 22, 2020 APPEARANCES: For Petitioner BRIAN BATES ASHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 1205 East Main Street Ashland, Ohio 44805 For Respondent Ashland County, Case No. 20 COA 027 2 Wise, John, J. {¶1} On October 13, 2020, Petitioner, Brian Bates, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. He did not identify a respondent in his petition. Mr. Bates’s argument is not easily followed, but he makes the following allegations in support of his writ: (1) “You are making injurious ‘presumptions’ which prejudice my Constitutional rights. I am not a vessel in commerce[.]” (2) “I am not a citizen, surety for subject of, an officer of, and do not owe allegiance, fealty, bond undertaking, obligation, duty tax, impost, or tribute. Matters are not being handled with efficiency, or are not being taken care of at all, usurpation of funds is occurring, there is rampant fraud and deceit[.]” (3) “Deputy was noticed at initial stop & crimes against my flesh & blood have been continual since.” (4) “ ‘Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation would abrogate them[.’ ”] {¶2} We find Mr. Bates cannot maintain an action for habeas corpus and his petition is sua sponte dismissed. We are permitted to dismiss a habeas corpus petition sua sponte if the petition does not contain a facially valid claim. State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 82 Ohio St.3d 270, 271, 695 N.E.2d 254 (1988). {¶3} the Ohio Here, Mr. Bates failed to attach his commitment papers. The Court reviewed Department of Rehabilitation and Correction’s (https://appgateway.drc.ohio.gov/OffenderSearch/Search/Details/A748953) website and confirmed Mr. Bates was released from the Southeastern Correctional Institution on July 2, 2020. It appears Mr. Bates may be incarcerated in the Ashland County Jail. However, without a copy of any commitment papers, and based on the information from the above website, we must assume Mr. Bates is not currently incarcerated. Ashland County, Case No. 20 COA 027 {¶4} 3 R.C. 2725.04(D) requires a copy of the commitment or cause of detention be attached to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Without the commitment papers, the writ of habeas corpus is fatally defective. Brown v. Rogers, 72 Ohio St.3d 339, 341, 650 N.E.2d 422 (1995). A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for habeas corpus that fails to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D). See State ex rel. Wynn v. McFaul, 81 Ohio St.3d 193, 194, 690 N.E.2d 7 (1998) (Ohio Supreme Court affirmed court of appeals’ sua sponte dismissal of habeas corpus petition for failure to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D).) {¶5} We also note Mr. Bates failed to identify a proper respondent. This also serves as an independent basis to sua sponte dismiss his writ. See State ex rel. Sherrills v. State, 91 Ohio St.3d 133, 742 N.E.2d 651 (Ohio Supreme Court affirmed sua sponte dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus because petitioner did not name proper respondents.) {¶6} Therefore, we dismiss Mr. Bates’s writ of habeas corpus. It appears he may no longer be incarcerated and he submitted no commitment papers indicating otherwise. Further, Mr. Bates failed to identify a proper respondent. Ashland County, Case No. 20 COA 027 {¶7} 4 For the foregoing reasons, we sua sponte dismiss Mr. Bates’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon Mr. Bates and the Ashland County Prosecutor notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. See Civ.R. 58(B). By: Wise, John, J. Hoffman, P. J., and Wise, Earle, J., concur. JWW/AC 1014
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
