State v. Roberts
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Roberts, 2017-Ohio-7002.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vsALEX JEFFREY ROBERTS Defendant-Appellant : : : : : : : : : JUDGES: Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J. Case No. 2017CA00009 OPINION CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2015CR0001 JUDGMENT: Dismissed DATE OF JUDGMENT: June 27, 2017 APPEARANCES: For Plaintiffs-Appellants For Defendants-Appellees JASON R. FARLEY 145 North 7th Street Cambridge, OH 43725 FREDERICK A. SEALOVER 45 North 4th Street P.O. Box 2910 Zanesville, OH 43702-2910 Stark County Case No. 2017CA00009 2 Wise, Earle, J. {¶ 1} Appellant Alex Jeffrey Roberts appeals the February 14, 2017 judgment of conviction and sentence of the Guernsey County Court of Common Pleas. Appellee is the State of Ohio. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY {¶ 2} In August, 2015, the Guernsey County Grand Jury returned an indictment charging Roberts with one count of aggravated possession of drugs in violation of R.C. 2925.11, a felony of the fifth degree. On February 14, 2017, Roberts pled guilty to the charge and sentenced to six month incarceration. He was given 110 days credit for time served. Roberts’ sentence was complete in April 2017. {¶ 3} Roberts filed an appeal and the matter is now before this court for consideration. He raises one assignment of error: I {¶ 4} THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY DENYING THE DEFENDANTAPPELLANT’S REQUEST FOR JAIL-TIME CREDIT FOR TIME THAT DEFENDNATAPPELLANT SERVED FOR MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES RELATED TO HIS FELONY OFFENSE, PRIOR TO HIS INDICTMENT. {¶ 5} Roberts does not challenge his conviction for aggravated possession of drugs. Rather, he challenges the length of his sentence, arguing he should have received an additional 70 days of jail time credit for time he served on related misdemeanor offenses before being indicted for the felony possession charge. Roberts asks this court to vacate his sentence and remand the matter for a new sentencing hearing. Stark County Case No. 2017CA00009 3 {¶ 6} But Roberts has completed his sentence. As this court found in State v. McAbee, 5th Dist. No. 16COA016, 2016-Ohio-8234 ¶ 15: An appeal challenging a conviction is not moot even if the entire sentence has been served before the appeal is heard, because “[a] person convicted of a felony has a substantial stake in the judgment of conviction which survives the satisfaction of the judgment imposed upon him or her.” State v. Golston, 71 Ohio St .3d 224, 1994-Ohio109, 643 N.E.2d 109, paragraph one of the syllabus. “However, this logic does not apply if Appellant is appealing solely on the issue of the length of his sentence and not on the underlying conviction. If an individual has already served his sentence, there is no collateral disability or loss of civil rights that can be remedied by a modification of the length of that sentence in the absence of a reversal of the underlying conviction.” State v. Campbell, 166 Ohio App.3d 363, 2006–Ohio–2294, 850 N.E.2d 799, paragraph eight, citing State v. Beamon, 11th Dist. Lake No.2000-L-160, 2001-Ohio-8712. {¶ 7} Because Roberts has already been released from incarceration on the felony possession charge, ruling in his favor would grant no relief. We therefore find the sole assignment of error moot. Stark County Case No. 2017CA00009 4 {¶ 8} For the foregoing reasons, the appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Guernsey County, Ohio, is dismissed. By Wise, Earle, J. Delaney, P.J. and Hoffman, J. concur. EEW/rw 719
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
