State ex rel. Branco v. Haas

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. Branco v. Haas, 2013-Ohio-3836.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, ex rel., RAFEAL VERNON BRANCO Relator -vsJUDGE JOHN G. HAAS, STARK COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : : JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. Case No. 2013CA00096 OPINION CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Mandamus JUDGMENT: Dismissed DATE OF JUDGMENT: September 3, 2013 APPEARANCES: For Relator For Respondent RAFEAL VERNON BRANCO #234-003 P.O. Box 8107 Mansfield, OH 44901 JOHN D. FERRERO, JR. Stark County Prosecuting Attorney BY: RONALD MARK CALDWELL Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 110 Central Plaza, South Suite 510 Canton, OH 44702-1413 Stark County, Case No. 2013CA00096 2 Baldwin, J. {¶1} Relator, Rafeal Vernon Branco, has filed a Complaint for Writ of Mandamus requesting Respondent, Judge John G. Haas, issue an order requiring the Ohio Adult Parole Authority to consider releasing Relator on parole. {¶2} On May 20, 1991, Relator was sentenced to a term of twenty years to life in prison with parole eligibility after twenty years on one count of murder, a term of ten to twenty-five years on one count of Aggravated Burglary, and a term of ten to twentyfive years on one count of Aggravated Robbery. These sentences were ordered to be served consecutive to one another. Relator argues once he served twenty years, he was entitled to have a parole hearing. {¶3} Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. Relator has filed a motion for summary judgment. {¶4} Initially, we find Relator has failed to name a proper respondent. Relator offers no authority for the proposition that the named respondent is authorized to issue orders requiring the Adult Parole Authority to conduct parole hearings. A writ will not issue against an improper party. State ex rel. Isom v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority, 2002 WL 31243517, *2 (Ohio App. 7 Dist.). {¶5} Even if we were to find Respondent was a correct party to this action, Relator has failed to establish he is entitled to have a writ of mandamus issue. To be entitled to the requested extraordinary relief, [a relator] must establish a clear legal right to the requested relief, a clear legal duty on the part of appellees to provide it, and the lack of an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Waters v. Stark County, Case No. 2013CA00096 3 Spaeth, 131 Ohio St.3d 55, 2012-Ohio-69, 960 N.E.2d 452, ¶ 6. [A relator] must prove that they are entitled to the writ by clear and convincing evidence. Id. at ¶ 13. {¶6} Ohio law gives a convicted inmate no legitimate claim of entitlement to parole prior to the expiration of a valid sentence of imprisonment. State ex rel. Seikbert v. Wilkinson, 69 Ohio St.3d 489, 490, 633 N.E.2d 1128 (1994). The statute granting the parole authority discretion to grant parole, R.C. 2967.03, creates no expectancy of parole or a constitutional liberty interest sufficient to establish a right of procedural due process. Id., citing Hattie v. Anderson, 68 Ohio St.3d 232, 233, 626 N.E.2d 67 (1994); State ex rel. Adkins v. Capots, 46 Ohio St.3d 187, 188, 546 N.E.2d 412 (1989). It follows that, an inmate has no constitutional or statutory right to parole, he has no concomitant right to a particular date for the consideration of parole, and a change in such dates is not a constitutional violation. State ex rel. Henderson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 81 Ohio St.3d 267, 268, 690 N.E.2d 887 (1998). {¶7} Relator cannot establish that he has a clear legal right to a parole hearing. Relator s sentence has not expired. Further, as previously noted, Relator cannot establish any legal duty on the part of the named Respondent to order a parole hearing to take place. Stark County, Case No. 2013CA00096 {¶8} 4 For these reasons, the requested writ of mandamus will not issue. The complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. By: Baldwin, J. Hoffman, P. J. and Delaney, J. concur. HON. CRAIG R. BALDWIN HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY CRB/ ads [Cite as State ex rel. Branco v. Haas, 2013-Ohio-3836.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, ex rel., RAFEAL VERNON BRANCO Relator -vsJUDGE JOHN G. HAAS, STARK COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : JUDGMENT ENTRY CASE NO. 2013CA00096 For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion on file, the Complaint is dismissed. Costs assessed to relator. HON. CRAIG R. BALDWIN HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.