Hill v. Cook

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Hill v. Cook, 2010-Ohio-2716.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DARNELL D. HILL Petitioner JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. -vsBRIAN COOK, WARDEN Respondent Case No. 2010CA00077 OPINION CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus JUDGMENT: Dismissed DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: June 14, 2010 APPEARANCES: For Petitioner For Respondent DARNELL D. HILL #A203-099 Madison Correctional Institution P. O. Box 740 1851 State Route 56 London, OH 43140-0740 NO APPEARANCE Stark County, Case No. 2010CA00077 2 Farmer, J. {¶1} Petitioner Darnell Hill has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In his Petition, Hill avers he is imprisoned in Madison Correctional Institution in London, Ohio. Because Petitioner Hill is not located within this Court s territorial jurisdiction, the instant cause of action must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. R.C. 2725.03 and Bridges v. McMackin (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 135, 541 N.E.2d 1035. A petition for habeas corpus must be filed where the person being detained is physically located. Id. {¶2} For this reason, the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is denied, and the Petition is dismissed. {¶3} MOTION DENIED. {¶4} CAUSE DISMISSED. {¶5} COSTS TO PETITIONER. {¶6} IT IS SO ORDERED. By Farmer, J. Hoffman, P. J. and Wise, J. concur. _s/ Sheila G. Farmer__________________ _s/ William B. Hoffman________________ _s/ John W. Wise_____________________ JUDGES Stark County, Case No. 2010CA00077 3 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DARNELL D. HILL Petitioner -vsBRIAN COOK, WARDEN Respondent : : : : : : : : : JUDGMENT ENTRY Case No. 2010CA00077 For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is denied, and the Petition is dismissed. Cost to Petitioner. _s/ Sheila G. Farmer__________________ _s/ William B. Hoffman________________ _s/ John W. Wise_____________________ JUDGES

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.