Barnes v. Hanna
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Barnes v. Hanna, 2021-Ohio-1588.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA DEMETRIUS A. BARNES, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 109859 v. : HOWARD HANNA, ET AL., : Defendants-Appellees. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: APPLICATION DENIED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: May 3, 2021 Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-15-600442-A Cleveland Heights Municipal Court Case No. B8-2425-J Application for Reopening Motion No. 546019 Appearances: Demetrius A. Barnes, pro se. MICHELLE J. SHEEHAN, J.: On April 22, 2021, the applicant, Demetrius A. Barnes, pursuant to App.R. 26(B) and State v. Murnahan, 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204 (1992) filed an application to reopen. In the caption, Barnes refers to two different cases, State v. Barnes, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-15-600442-A, and Barnes v. Howard Hanna, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109859. Thus, it is difficult to discern which case he seeks to reopen. For the following reasons, this court denies the application. In State v. Barnes, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-15-600442-A, (hereinafter the “Criminal Case”), on April 5, 2017, Barnes pled guilty to burglary and theft. The trial court imposed two years of community control on each count. The docket of this case shows that on March 13, 2019, the trial court terminated Barnes’s community control sanction. Barnes never appealed this case. In Barnes v. Howard Hanna, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109859 (hereinafter the “Civil Case”), Barnes, pro se, tried to appeal from Cleveland Heights M.C. No. B8-2425-J, on July 31, 2020. However, on August 5, 2020, this court dismissed the appeal, because Barnes did not file the notice of appeal in the trial court as required by App.R. 3(A). He now files this application to reopen in which he refers to Howard Hanna, the sale of property, lack of notice of the sale, and lack of a contract. To the extent that Barnes is trying to reopen his appeal in the Civil Case, App.R. 26(B) is the wrong remedy. This rule applies only to appeals from judgments of convictions and sentences, in other words, only to criminal cases. To the extent that Barnes is trying to file a motion for reconsideration under App.R. 26(A), this court denies the motion, because such motions for reconsideration are to be filed within ten days of this court’s judgment. To the extent that Barnes is seeking to reopen the Criminal Case, App.R. 26(B) is inapplicable because there was never an appeal. To the extent that he is seeking to file a motion for delayed appeal under App.R. 5, this court declines to grant such a motion, because the criminal case does not appear to be the focus of the application and because Barnes has been released from his community control sanction after pleading guilty. Accordingly, this court denies the application to reopen. MICHELLE J. SHEEHAN, JUDGE MARY J. BOYLE, A.J., and SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
