State v. Foster

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State v. Foster, 2012-Ohio-5702.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98929 STATE OF OHIO RESPONDENT vs. TRAVIS FOSTER RELATOR JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 459159 Order No. 460255 RELEASE DATE: November 30, 2012 FOR RELATOR Travis Foster Inmate No. A600-699 Marion Correctional Institution P.O. Box 57 Marion, OH 43301-0057 ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 9th Floor, Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113 COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J.: {¶1} Travis Foster has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus and seeks an order from this court requiring Judge Peter J. Corrigan to rule on motions for jail-time credit filed in Cuyahoga C.P. Case Nos. CR-542068, CR-543148, and CR-544799. Judge Corrigan has 1 filed a motion for summary judgment, which is granted for the following reasons. Pursuant to Civ.R. 19(A), Judge Peter J. Corrigan is added as a necessary party to this 1 {¶2} Initially, we find that Foster s complaint for a writ of mandamus is defective, because it is improperly captioned. The complaint for a writ of mandamus must be brought in the name of the state on relation of the person applying. R.C. 2731.04; Maloney v. Court of Common Pleas of Allen Cty., 173 Ohio St. 226, 181 N.E.2d 270 (1962); Gannon v. Gallagher, 145 Ohio St. 170, 60 N.E.2d 666 (1945). {¶3} Further review of the complaint for a writ of mandamus discloses that Foster has failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25, which requires the attachment of an affidavit to the complaint for a writ of mandamus that describes each civil action or appeal filed within the previous five years in any state or federal court. Foster s failure to comply with R.C. 2969.25 warrants the dismissal of the complaint for a writ of mandamus. State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd., 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 1998-Ohio-218, 696 N.E.2d 594; Alford v. Winters, 80 Ohio St.3d 285, 1997-Ohio-117, 685 N.E.2d 1242. It must also be noted that Foster has failed to comply with Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a), which mandates that his complaint for a writ of mandamus must be supported by an affidavit that specifies the details of the claim. State ex rel. Leon v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 123 Ohio St.3d 124, 2009-Ohio-4688, 914 N.E.2d 402; State ex rel. Wilson v. Calabrese, 8th Dist. No. 70077, 1996 Ohio App. LEXIS 6213 (Jan. 18, 1996). original action and is designated as the respondent. {¶4} Finally, Foster s request for a writ of mandamus is moot. respondent s motion for summary judgment are copies of Attached to the judgment entries, journalized on October 4, 2012, that demonstrate that Perry has been granted jail-time credit in the amount of 145 days in CR-542068, CR-543148, and CR-544799. Thus, Foster s request for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Snider v. Stapleton, 65 Ohio St.3d 40, 600 N.E.2d 240 (1992); State ex rel. Richard v. Wells, 64 Ohio St.3d 76, 591 N.E.2d 1240 (1992); State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983). {¶5} Accordingly, we grant Judge Corrigan s motion for summary judgment. to Judge Corrigan. Costs ordered waived. Costs The court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B). {¶6} Writ denied. __________________________________________ COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, JUDGE PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, A.J., and KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J., CONCUR

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.