State ex rel. Bradley v. Saffold
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Bradley v. Saffold, 2012-Ohio-5081.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98512 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., HONESTO BRADLEY RELATOR vs. JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD RESPONDENT JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 456424 Order No. 459431 RELEASE DATE: October 30, 2012 RELATOR Honesto Bradley, Pro Se Inmate No. 621-054 2500 South Avon Belden Road Grafton Correctional Institution Grafton, Ohio 44044 ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 9th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, A.J.: {¶1} Honesto Bradley has filed a complaint for a writ of procedendo. Bradley seeks an order from this court, which requires Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold to render a ruling with regard to a motion for jail-time credit filed in State v. Bradley, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-526262. For the following reasons, we grant Judge Saffold s motion for summary judgment. {¶2} Initially, we find that Bradley s complaint for a writ of procedendo is procedurally defective. Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a) provides that a complaint for an extraordinary writ must be supported by a sworn affidavit that specifies the details of Bradley s claim. A simple statement that verifies that Bradley has reviewed the complaint and that the contents are true and accurate does not satisfy the mandatory requirement under Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a). State ex rel. Jones v. McGinty, 8th Dist. No. 92602, 2009-Ohio-1258; State ex rel. Mayes v. Ambrose, 8th Dist. No. 91980, 2009-Ohio-25; James v. Callahan, 8th Dist. No. 89654, 2007-Ohio-2237. {¶3} In addition, Bradley s request for a writ of procedendo is moot. Attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of a journal entry that demonstrates Bradley was granted jail-time credit in the amount of 90 days. Judge Saffold has discharged her duty to render a ruling with regard to the motion for jail-time credit that renders the request for a writ of procedendo moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983). It must also be noted that any error associated with the calculation of jail-time credit must be addressed through an appeal. State ex rel. Britton v. Foley-Jones, 8th Dist. No. 73646, 1998 Ohio App. LEXIS 856 (Mar. 5, 1998); State ex rel. Spates v. Sweeney, 8th Dist. No. 71986, 1997 Ohio App. LEXIS 1516 (Apri. 17, 1997). {¶4} Accordingly, we grant Judge Saffold s motion for summary judgment. Bradley to pay costs. The court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B). {¶5} Writ denied. PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., and KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
