State v. Golden

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State v. Golden, 2009-Ohio-1231.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92889 STATE OF OHIO RESPONDENT vs. JAMES GOLDEN RELATOR JUDGMENT: PETITION DISMISSED WRIT OF MANDAMUS ORDER NO. 419585 RELEASE DATE: March 18, 2009 FOR RELATOR: 2 James Golden, pro se Inmate No. 550-325 Lake Erie Correctional Inst. P.O. Box 8000 Conneaut, Ohio 44030-8000 ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: William D. Mason Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Justice Center, 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 JUDGE MELODY J. STEWART: {¶ 1} On February 27, 2009, relator, James Golden, commenced this mandamus action against respondent, Judge Peter Corrigan, to compel him to rule on his motion for jail time credit in State v. Golden, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. CR-502530, which was filed on July 17, 2008. For the following reasons, we sua sponte dismiss the petition. {¶ 2} Initially we find that the petition for a writ of mandamus is fatally defective since it is improperly captioned. A petition for a writ of mandamus must be brought in the name of the state, on relation of the person applying. Golden s failure to properly caption his petition as to the writ of mandamus constitutes sufficient reason for dismissal. Allen v. Court of Common Pleas of 3 Allen Cty. (1962), 173 Ohio St. 226, 181 N.E.2d 270; Dunning v. Cleary (Jan. 11, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 78763. {¶ 3} Golden also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25, which mandates that he attach an affidavit to his complaint that describes each civil action or appeal of a civil action filed in the previous five years. The failure to provide such affidavit constitutes sufficient grounds for dismissal of the relator s complaint for a writ of mandamus. State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Board, 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 2008-Ohio-218, 696 N.E.2d 594; State ex rel. Alford v. Winters, 80 Ohio St.3d 285, 1997-Ohio-117, 685 N.E.2d 1242. {¶ 4} Nevertheless, a review of the lower court s docket indicates that Judge Corrigan denied Golden s motion for jail time credit on February 18, 2009. Thus, Golden s request for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163; State ex rel. Jerningham v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 658 N.E.2d 723. {¶ 5} Accordingly, we sua sponte dismiss Golden s petition for a writ of mandamus. Costs to respondent. It is further ordered that the clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and date of entry pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B). {¶ 6} Petition dismissed. 4 MELODY J. STEWART, JUDGE COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, A.J., and JAMES J. SWEENEY, J., CONCUR

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.