Sherrick v. McCoy

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Sherrick v. McCoy, 2003-Ohio-7237.] *** Please see original opinion at Sherrick v. McCoy, 2003Ohio-6886. *** Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA GERALD E. FUERST, CLERK OF COURTS DIXIE SHERRICK, ET AL. Plaintiffs-Appellees : v. DAVID MCCOY, ET AL. Defendants-Appellants : : COA NO. : : : : : : : LOWER COURT NO. 82234 CV-446951 COMMON PLEAS COURT MOTION NO. 355586 Date DECEMBER 31, 2003 JOURNAL ENTRY {¶1} The Journal Entry and Opinion of this court released on December 18, 2003 in this case is corrected at page 7, lines 1 and the paragraph originally read as follows: {¶2} And even though Robert was one of Renier s employees at the time of the accident, he is also not entitled to coverage, because there is no evidence he was the sole owner of Renier or that he was injured while in the scope of his employment. Galatis, ¶2, syllabus. {¶3} The corrected paragraph now reads: {¶4} And even though Robert was one of Renier s employees at the time of the accident, he is also not entitled to coverage, because there is no evidence he was the sole owner of Renier or that he suffered a loss while in the scope of his employment. Galatis, ¶2, syllabus. {¶5} It is hereby ordered that said Journal Entry and Opinion of December 18, 2003 be amended nunc pro tunc to correct the error on page 7 of the Opinion as stated above. {¶6} It is further ordered that, as so amended, said Journal Entry and Opinion of December 18, 2003 shall stand in full force and effect in all its particulars. JUDGE DIANE KARPINSKI MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN, P.J., and ANTHONY O. CALABRESE, JR., J., concur..

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.