Chasteen v. Dayton Corr. Inst.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Chasteen v. Dayton Corr. Inst., 2011-Ohio-4370.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us ADAM CHASTEEN Plaintiff v. DAYTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Defendant Case No. 2011-01721-AD Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert ENTRY OF DISMISSAL {¶1} On January 26, 2011, plaintiff, Adam Chasteen, filed a complaint against defendant, Dayton Correctional Institution. Defendant received the complaint on January 28, 2011. On April 4, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. In support of the motion for default judgment, plaintiff stated in pertinent part: {¶2} Pursuant to L.C.C.R. 6(A), the defendant in this action shall file the investigation report within sixty (60) days of receipt of the claim by the defendant; Plaintiff submits that no request for an extension of time has been filed by the Defendant, and that no answer or other defense has been filed by the Defendant. {¶3} Wherefore, Plaintiff respectfully seeks an order from the Court entering an order of default judgment against the Defendant, and granting the relief requested in the original complaint to Plaintiff Chasteen. {¶4} On April 8, 2011, defendant filed a motion for extension of time to file the investigation report. pertinent part stated: In support of the motion for extension of time, defendant in Case No. 2011-01721-AD -2- ENTRY {¶5} Defendant requests an additional fourteen (14) days in order to file an Investigation Report in this case. The reason that this extension is necessary is the Defendant requires additional time to complete its investigation and gather documents. {¶6} Civ.R. 55(D) in pertinent part states: {¶7} No judgment by default shall be entered against this state . . . or agency . . . unless the claimant establishes his claim . . . by evidence satisfactory to the court. {¶8} A default judgment against the state may not be granted solely on procedural errors made by the defendant. Upon review, plaintiff s motion for default judgment is DENIED. Defendant s motion for extension of time is MOOT. {¶9} On April 27, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss. The plaintiff contends this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear his claim so he requests his claim be dismissed. On April 27, 2011, defendant also filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and plaintiff s case is DISMISSED. Defendant s motion to dismiss is MOOT. The court shall absorb the court costs of this case. ________________________________ DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk Entry cc: Adam Chasteen, #566-894 P.O. Box 740 London, Ohio 43140 DRB/laa 4/26 Filed 5/26/11 Sent to S.C. reporter 8/26/11 Stephen A. Young Department of Rehabilitation and Correction 770 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43222
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
