Gillespie v. Marion Correctional Inst.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Gillespie v. Marion Correctional Inst., 2011-Ohio-2741.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us DERRICK GILLESPIE Plaintiff v. MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Defendant Case No. 2010-11234-AD Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert MEMORANDUM DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT {¶ 1} 1) Plaintiff, Derrick Gillespie, an individual formerly incarcerated at defendant, Marion Correctional Institution (MCI), filed this action contending his photographs, greeting cards, and printed copies of family members obituaries were lost while under the control of MCI staff at sometime after June 22, 2010. In his complaint, plaintiff pointed out he was willing to accept a $75.00 offer for my loss and has now requested damage recovery in the amount of $200.00 for the property loss including claims for pain, suffering, (inconvenience) and emotional distress attendant to his property loss.1 Payment of the filing fee was waived. {¶ 2} 2) Defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability for plaintiff s loss, but disputing his damage claim. Defendant advised, [p]laintiff is entitled only to a reasonable value of that property, lost while in the possession of MCI staff. 1 Initially, it should be noted that this court does not recognize entitlement to damages for mental distress and extraordinary damages for simple negligence involving property loss. Galloway v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1979), 78-0731-AD; Berke v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Welfare (1976), 52 Ohio App. 2d 271, 6 O.O. 3d 280, 369 N.E. 2d 1056. Consequently, the court shall address CONCLUSIONS OF LAW {¶ 3} 1) Negligence on the part of defendant has been shown in respect to the issue protecting plaintiff s property after he was transferred. Billups v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (2001), 2000-10634-AD, jud. {¶ 4} 2) As trier of fact, this court has the power to award reasonable damages based on evidence presented. Sims v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (1988), 61 Ohio Misc. 2d 239, 577 N.E. 2d 160. {¶ 5} 3) Damage assessment is a matter within the function of the trier of fact. Litchfield v. Morris (1985), 25 Ohio App. 3d 42, 25 OBR 115, 495 N.E. 2d 462. Reasonable certainty as to the amount of damages is required, which is that degree of certainty of which the nature of the case admits. Bemmes v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Sys. Of Ohio (1995), 102 Ohio App. 3d 782, 658 N.E. 2d 31. {¶ 6} 4) The standard measure of damages for personal property is market value. McDonald v. Ohio State Univ. Veterinary Hosp. (1994), 67 Ohio Misc. 2d 40, 644 N.E. 2d 750. Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $60.00. Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us DERRICK GILLESPIE Plaintiff v. plaintiff s claim based on the standard measure of damages for property loss. MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Defendant Case No. 2010-11234-AD Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $60.00. Court costs are assessed against defendant. DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk Entry cc: Derrick Gillespie 999 Moeller Avenue Akron, Ohio 44307 RDK/laa 3/2 Filed 3/9/11 Sent to S.C. reporter 5/27/11 Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel Department of Rehabilitation and Correction 770 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43222
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
