Exum v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Exum v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2011-Ohio-5993.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us MATTHEW EXUM, Case No. 2008-09589 Plaintiff, v. Judge Alan C. Travis Magistrate Anderson M. Renick OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, Defendant. JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶1} This case is sua sponte assigned to Judge Alan C. Travis to conduct all proceedings necessary for decision in this matter. {¶2} On August 22, 2011, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant. On September 14, 2011, the court issued an entry granting plaintiff s motion for an extension of time to file objections to the magistrate's decision on or before October 20, 2011. {¶3} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: A party may file written objections to a magistrate s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i). No objections were filed. {¶4} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. _____________________________________ Case No. 2008-09589 -2ALAN C. TRAVIS Judge cc: Richard F. Swope 6480 East Main Street, Suite 102 Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068 Filed October 31, 2011 To S.C. reporter November 18, 2011 Stephanie D. Pestello-Sharf Assistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 ENTRY

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.