In re Latimore
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as In re Latimore, 2007-Ohio-4759.] Court of Claims of Ohio Victims of Crime Division The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Fourth Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9860 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us IN RE: VICTOR L. LATIMORE Case No. V2007-90277 VICTOR L. LATIMORE Applicant Commissioners: Clarence E. Mingo II, Presiding Gregory P. Barwell Randi Ostry LeHoty ORDER OF A THREECOMMISSIONER PANEL {¶1} The applicant filed a reparations application seeking reimbursement of expenses incurred with respect to a November 5, 2006 assault. On January 24, 2007, the Attorney General denied the claim pursuant to R.C. 2743.60(E) because the applicant was convicted of felony non-support/contributing to non-support of dependents on January 18, 2000, which is within ten years of the criminally injurious conduct. On February 12, 2007, the applicant filed a request for reconsideration. On February 14, 2007, the Attorney General denied the claim once again. On March 29, 2007, the applicant filed a notice of appeal to the Attorney General s February 14, 2007 Final Decision. At 10:15 A.M. on June 21, 2007, this matter was heard before this panel of three commissioners. {¶2} The applicant, applicant s counsel, and an Assistant Attorney General attended the hearing and presented testimony and oral argument for the panel s Case No. V -5- consideration. ORDER Mr. Latimore briefly testified concerning the details of his felony conviction. Mr. Latimore explained that the conviction was a mistake and that he is currently paying child support. {¶3} The Assistant Attorney General summarized the case and reiterated her position for denying the claim. However, applicant s counsel argued that based upon the nature of the applicant s felony conviction, the claim should be allowed. {¶4} From review of the file and with full and careful consideration given to all the information presented at the hearing, we find that the February 14, 2007 decision of the Attorney General shall be affirmed. {¶5} IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT {¶6} 1) The February 14, 2007 decision of the Attorney General is {¶7} 2) This claim is DENIED and judgment is rendered for the state of Ohio; {¶8} 3) Costs are assumed by the court of claims victims of crime fund. AFFIRMED; _______________________________________ CLARENCE E. MINGO II Presiding Commissioner _______________________________________ GREGORY P. BARWELL Commissioner _______________________________________ [Cite as In re Latimore, 2007-Ohio-4759.] RANDI OSTRY LE HOTY Commissioner ID #\2-dld-tad-062507 A copy of the foregoing was personally served upon the Attorney General and sent by regular mail to Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney and to: Filed 8-17-2007 Jr. Vol. 2266, Pgs. 26-28 To S.C. Reporter 9-13-2007
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
