Whiteside v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Whiteside v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2006-Ohio-4739.] NORMAN V. WHITESIDE Plaintiff Case No. 2005-07852 Judge Joseph T. Clark Magistrate Steven A. Larson v. JUDGMENT ENTRY DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION Defendant {¶ 1} On June 13, 2006, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The magistrate issued a decision recommending that defendant s motion be granted, in part, and denied, in part. {¶ 2} Upon review, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate s decision and recommendation as its own. Defendant s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, in part, as it pertains to plaintiff s cause of action that accrued in 1989, and DENIED, in part, as it pertains to plaintiff s claims involving the allegedly toxic cleaning product. JOSEPH T. CLARK Judge Entry cc: Richard F. Swope 6504 E. Main St. Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068 Attorney for Plaintiff [Cite as Whiteside v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2006-Ohio-4739.] Jana M. Brown Velda K. Hofacker Carr Assistant Attorneys General 150 East Gay Street, 23rd Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 MR/cmd Filed August 21, 2006 To S.C. reporter September 12, 2006 Attorneys for Defendant
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
