Wysong v. Ohio Reformatory for Women

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Wysong v. Ohio Reformatory for Women, 2004-Ohio-5452.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO JENNIFER WYSONG Plaintiff : v. OHIO REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN : CASE NO. 2003-08304 Judge J. Warren Bettis : Magistrate Steven A. Larson : JUDGMENT ENTRY Defendant : ::::::::::::::::: {¶ 1} This case was tried to a magistrate of the court. On August 24, 2004, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant. {¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(E)(3)(a) states: A party may file written objections to a magistrate s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, regardless of whether the court has adopted the decision pursuant to Civ.R. 53(E)(4)(c). *** Plaintiff has not filed an objection. {¶ 3} Upon review of the record and the magistrate s decision, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate s decision and recommendation as its own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. ________________________________ FRED J. SHOEMAKER Judge Entry cc: Case No. 2003-08304 -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY Jennifer Wysong, #40610 1479 Collins Avenue Marysville, Ohio 43040 Plaintiff, Pro se Stephanie D. Pestello-Sharf Assistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 23rd Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 Attorney for Defendant LM/cmd Filed September 24, 2004 To S.C. reporter October 12, 2004

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.