Barnett v. Madison Corr. Inst.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Barnett v. Madison Corr. Inst., 2004-Ohio-5438.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO KEITH BARNETT Plaintiff : v. MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION : CASE NO. 2003-08177 Judge J. Warren Bettis : Magistrate Steven A. Larson : JUDGMENT ENTRY : Defendant ::::::::::::::::: {¶ 1} This case was tried to a magistrate of the court. On August 6, 2004, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant. {¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(E)(3)(a) states: A party may file written objections to a magistrate s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, regardless of whether the court has adopted the decision pursuant to Civ.R. 53(E)(4)(c). *** Plaintiff has not filed an objection. {¶ 3} Upon review of the record and the magistrate s decision, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate s decision and recommendation as its own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. ________________________________ JOSEPH T. CLARK Judge Entry cc: Case No. 2003-08177 -2- Keith Barnett 214 Hidden Beach Road Marblehead, Ohio 43440 Plaintiff, Pro se John P. Reichley Assistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 23rd Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 Attorney for Defendant LM/cmd Filed September 9, 2004 To S.C. reporter October 12, 2004 JUDGMENT ENTRY

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.